Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Consequence Arguments

David Botting

Abstract


The Consequence Argument, in various forms, has been popular in recent discussions of libertarianism. I want to ask: what is the nature of the ‘necessity’ involved in the claim that necessarilyone cannot change the past or the laws of nature? I will answer that this necessity is not peculiar to the thesis of determinism and does not depend directly on the unchangeability of facts about the remote past; parallel consequence arguments can be constructed to show that libertarian free will is equally incompatible with indeterminism, fatalism, and naturalism.

Keywords


free will; libertarianism; the consequence argument

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.4454/philinq.v2i1.41

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.