Why Authenticity precedes Autonomy
Keywords:authenticity, autonomy, reflection, identificatiion, reasons, attitudes
Most thinkers either identify authenticity with autonomy or take the one to be a core condition for the other. In this paper, I discuss what I believe that authenticity is not. My aim is to distinguish the two notions in regard to their very essence, function and role in our everyday life, while I argue that the conditions of the prominent conceptions of authenticity that relate it to autonomy are unconvincing. I investigate the weaknesses of both the higher-order endorsement models and the externalist historical models by maintaining that none of activity, wholeheartedness, reflection, and rationality is either necessary or sufficient for authenticity. Since manipulation in regard to higher-order desires may take place, one can meet any of these conditions while at the same time being inauthentic. Given this, it has been argued that although these conditions are perhaps insufficient for authenticity, they are still necessary. However, I argue that they are also unnecessary — that is, authenticity comes before activity, wholeheartedness, reflection and rationality, and not vice versa.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work five (5) years after publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
After five years from first publication, Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.