Beccaria on Discounting Intentions in Adjudicating Punishments for Crimes

Authors

  • Dale Jacquette Universität Bern Institut für Philosophie Abteilung Logik und theoretische Philosophie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4454/philinq.v2i2.40

Keywords:

Beccaria, Cesare, criminal liability, intentions, proto-utilitarianism,

Abstract

This essay considers Cesare Beccaria's arguments in Chapter 7 of Dei delitti e delle pene for discounting an agent's intentions in assigning punishments for crimes. Beccaria offers four different arguments in this compact section of the book, including the impenetrable subjectivity of another subject's intentionality and the risk of committing blasphemy by punishing intentions to act as sins and effectively usurping God's authority. These objections are answered and the role of intentions in determining criminal guilt and appropriate punishments is investigated in light of Beccaria's objections.

Author Biography

Dale Jacquette, Universität Bern Institut für Philosophie Abteilung Logik und theoretische Philosophie

ordentlicher Professor Dr., Institut für Philosophie, Abteilung Logik und theoretische Philosophie

Downloads

Published

2014-04-07

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2014)

Section

Focus

License

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work five (5) years after publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

After five years from first publication, Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.